May 2005 | ARCHIVE |
| ||
|
There was only one supreme mission for Jesus Christ in this world. That message of Christ was definitely his death. The brazen serpent was lifted up by Moses; so was Christ lifted up upon the cross in His crucifixion. He was exalted and glorified in the midst of the humiliation and rejection that He suffered. The hope of Christian faith is through death. When Jesus was crucified, He was lifted up from the earth, as an ensign of beacon so as to draw the eyes and the hearts of all men unto him.
|
|
The cited scripture portion refers to a small group of gentile Greeks who sought to see Jesus, the king of kings. Bonhoeffer, a famous German Theologian had told about Jesus that, 'He had come to this world to die'. There was only one supreme mission for Jesus Christ in this world. That message of Christ was definitely his death. In the third chapter of Gospel according to St. John, we read that Nicodemus, a ruler and a scholar of the Jews, came to Jesus by night to interview Him concerning the great mysteries of the Gospel and enquired: what is His message and what is His role in the Salvation plan of God. Jesus explained him about the great design of his own coming into the world, alluding to Old Testament Scripture words; 'And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up' [O.T. Scripture Ref: Numbers 21:8]. The brazen serpent was lifted up by Moses; so was Christ lifted up upon the cross in His crucifixion. He was exalted and glorified in the midst of the humiliation and rejection that He suffered. Jesus himself spoke of crucifixion as glorification.
If we look through the life of Jesus in the depth of it's minuteness, we can observe the truth that His life had a well regulated composition. The incarnation had happened in the fullness of time as per the perfect plan of God. During the end of His public mission, the Passover feast and its arrangements were splendid and well sequenced. Further to this, His passion, trial, crucifixion, resurrection and all events were well synchronized and in a good order.
The story in this chapter is well balanced by giving an account of the events in the life of Jesus in a well-knitted sequence. Jesus took with Him Peter, James and John to the top of a high mountain apart and in His pomp and glory He was transfigured before them. Moses and Elias appeared to them and started conversing with Jesus. Those were the moments of great pleasure and satisfaction for those accompanied disciples as they took in the sight of Christ’s glory. Further in words 32 Jesus told; "And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to Myself." The necessity of His death is here brightly expressed and crucifixion becomes the supreme message of Christ to draw all the men to Him. Jesus had totally surrendered to the plan and will of His father.
Though Jesus reached the house of Lazarus only after four days of his death, he talked of it; 'Our friend Lazarus is sleeping, but I will awaken him out of sleep'. But this delay of Jesus was for the glory of God and for the manifestation of God’s glorious power. Jesus called the death of a believer as a sleep. This is what Church teaches us about death. Lazarus was to be raised again from this sleep. Only those who believe that there is a morning of the next day, can think of sleeping. The death of a faithful is only a departure from this world. The hope of Christian faith is through death.
Again, six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany, about two miles outside the city of Jerusalem, to the house of His friends. He lodged there with his friend Lazarus, whom he had lately raised from the dead. They made a supper for him . Crowds of the Jews from Jerusalem rushed to Bethany, not only to see Jesus but also to see the arisen Lazarus. Mary did him honour, by anointing his feet with a pound of costly ointment of spikenard and dried His feet with her hair. Though Judas did not favour that act of Mary’s compliment, Jesus justified Mary considering the act as that she reserved this for the day of His burial. Though it was a celebration of expressing their gratitude to Jesus, this visit of Jesus to Bethany turned out to be a farewell visit; Jesus came to take leave of them, and to give them words of comfort against the day of trial and crucifixion that was fast approaching. Jesus who came to this world to die had chosen this death-house of his friend Lazarus to teach them about the depth and sharpness of death. Jesus had spoken openly to His disciples, saying, ‘I am going to die, be buried, and rise again after three days.’ Lord Jesus plainly proclaims here of His death. Jesus gave His final public teaching here to everyone in - Jews and Greeks alike.
Before concluding His public mission in this world, Jesus wanted to know how the people identified Him. When Jesus reached along with His disciples in the village of Caesarea Philippi, He questioned His disciples, asking them, "Who do people say that I am?" Caesarea Philippi was considered to be a centre of all kind of evils. The disciples told Him that some people see Him as John the Baptist, some as Elijah and some others as a new prophet. These vivid and strange answers might have definitely troubled Jesus' soul. Unsatisfied by these answers, Jesus continued by questioning them, "But who do you say that I am?" Jesus wanted to see whether his disciples themselves could identify Him truly. Peter answered and said to Him, "You are the Christ, son of the Most High God". Jesus then looked towards Jerusalem and left that place. It was a journey from the city of evils to the city of holiness for the consummation of His glorification. Suffering and rejection sum up the whole cross of Jesus.
When Jesus found that his own people, his own relatives and his own villagers could not clearly involve Him or contemplate His true identity, He might have felt deeply concerned about it. This rejection might have been more painful than the crucifixion. Here we see there is a distinction between suffering and rejection. When our heart felt people reject us, isolate us or oppose us, we feel our heart broken. Our age in which we are living is an age of isolation. Though we are in a crowd, we feel isolated due to the dearth of love. Every man think only of himself or herself. We have many casual friends: but do we have real friends? Do we have anybody to whom we can open our mind? Do we have few with us to pray together in truth and spirit? This isolation causes a big loss in our life. Rejection is part of crucifixion. In spite of all this feeling of isolation and rejection we can see somebody who is very near to us. We can see somebody to whom we can share everything. That is Jesus. Yes, Jesus is our only unchanging friend. We can fully open our mind to Him, we can fully trust him, we can always rely upon him. Normally we choose our friends only from a group of good ones, but Jesus is not only looking for good but he is the friend of sinners also. Love of Jesus is beyond any condition. God demonstrated His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. We cannot count the depth or breadth of the love of our Lord.
There is a story of a man named Jim. He was a man very much isolated. He did not have any friends. He went alone to the Church. Nobody was there to accompany him. Every day noontime he goes to church regularly. He did not know how to pray. He prayed only one sentence; 'Lord, Jim is here.' Once Jim became sick and admitted to the hospital. He did not have any friends or relatives to visit him on his sick bed. One day noontime Jim heard a mild voice; 'Jim, I am here'. He could not see anybody nearby. As it was the same time he regularly went to the Church and said his only prayer; 'Lord, I am here’, he could recognize the voice and knew that it was the revisit of his Lord to whom he talked daily. He pulled out a chair near him. Every body thought he is mad and asked him, 'who is your visitor?' He knew very well that it is Jesus. Jesus is the refuge to all those who are destitute and isolated. This teaches us that privacy much befriends our communion with God.
Who were these Greeks in this referred scripture portion? These Greeks were probably Gentiles who migrated from Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter or they may be the Greek speaking Jews. They were the Greeks came to Jerusalem for worshiping at the festival. This is significant because we see the Gentiles, rather than Jews coming to see Jesus. They asked Andrews and Philip: Masters, we are interested to see Jesus. From the mode of salutation we can make out that they were scholars and distinguished. Greeks were normally considered as scholars. Fruitfulness of their education and intelligence were revealed through the wisdom and understanding they exposed to seek for the Lord. The honour given by these Greeks by enquiring after Him with a longing desire to see Jesus, signified the exaltation and glorification of Christ as the hour had come for the Son of Man to be glorified.
We observe a great difference in these Greek visitors from the Jews of Jesus' own country. Though Jesus was very near to them, the Jews could not contemplate who the Jesus is. 'He came unto his own, and his own received him not.' [John 1:11] The people of Israel were peculiarly His own above all people; of them he came, among them he lived, and to them he was first sent. The gentile Greeks were seeking for the same Jesus whom Jews have rejected.
By the honour given by heathens to Christ, the prophecy of Isaiah is fulfilled. 'And in that day there shall be a root of Jesse, which shall stand for an ensign of the people; to it shall the Gentiles seek: and his rest shall be glorious.' [Isaiah 11:10] The key to this prophecy speaks of Christ as the root of Jesse, or a branch out of his roots and accession of the Gentiles to His Kingdom of God is assured through son-ship. When Jesus was crucified, He was lifted up from the earth, as an ensign of beacon; he might draw the eyes and the hearts of all men unto him. The son-ship is the relation, which is inherited through faith. The mission of the believers is to make the way for all for the son-ship of God. The one who got the power is distributing the power to inherit the son-ship. Beyond any caste or creed, it is the great offer of God to come and acquire the son-ship. This is a great position and honour for which all are worthy and deserved. That is the great intention and plan of God.
One of the most prominent of the mental characteristics the ancient Greeks valued was their cleverness and national spirit. Other significant mental characteristics that the Greeks valued are faithfulness and loyalty. They were very dominant and authoritative in nature. They considered their culture and philosophies as great and distinguished. They were very proud of their intellectual might and never bothered to comprehend or realize any other nation or any other caste. They had little interest in the afterlife and most of the ancient Greeks believed that light and darkness are equal powers which try to compete with one another. Their myths and religion reflected these traits.
The viewpoints of ancient Jews were very much contrary to these. Jesus taught: 'Walk while you have the Light, so that darkness will not overtake you; he who walks in the darkness does not know where he goes.' [St. John 12:35] While Greeks gave importance to rational thinking, Jews gave importance for mystical thinking. Jews considered body, mind and soul are equally important in the life of human. The Sadducees and the Greek equally agreed in the theory that life ends with death and there is nothing beyond death. Their doctrines never opened any topic for the life after death. Jesus said that only those who prepare for the death have the chance for eternal life. Teachings of Jesus were revolutionary and opposing to the faith and doctrines they had for many years. Those who believe in life after death and faith in resurrection can have a hopeful and painless life in this world.
Jesus taught that the life becomes fruitful through the physical death. "Unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit." [John 12:24] Jesus points here a sacramental negation. Whatever we loose in this world for the sake of our faith in Lord Jesus Christ is being invested for the eternal life. The eternal life is promised for those who believe in the son of God and inherit the son-ship in this world. Those who dedicate their life as a sweet savour to Lord, only can inherit the eternal life in the coming world. The sacrament of baptism and Eucharist reveal this same essence. Both reveal our partnership with Jesus Christ. The eternal life is not started after death, but essentially it commences in this life itself. "For you have died and your life is hidden with Christ in God." (Colossians 3:3)
The incident of raising Lazarus was an incident laying axe to the root belief of the Greeks. This incident had opened the eyes of Greeks regarding their traditional faith prevailed for several centuries. This episode is well staged and well harmonized with exactitude of the original in the Gospel. On His arrival, the two sisters Martha and Maria lamented saying "Lord, if You had been here, my brother would not have died." Jesus appeased them assuring them that their brother will rise again. Martha replied Him out of their general faith by saying that she know that he will rise again in the resurrection at the last day. Jesus, being the best teacher known to the world, had best made use these circumstances to teach them about the afterlife. He taught them that He himself is the resurrection and the life and he who believes in Him will live even if he dies. This everlasting declaration of Jesus had made the Greeks to seek for Him.
Today many had started seeking for Jesus. But many find difficulty to meet Jesus due to the unbelieving multitude around Him. We see in the scriptures at two places where the one who earnestly sought for Jesus found difficulty to see Jesus due to the largeness of the multitude around Him. Firstly, when Jesus lodged in a house in Capernaum, the four faithful who brought one sick of the palsy to Jesus could not reach that man to Jesus. Many were gathered together in this house so that there was no longer room, not even near the door. Secondly, Zacchaeus the chief among the publicans very much longed to see Jesus and he ran very fast through the street of Jericho and he was unable to see Jesus because of the huge crowd around Jesus. During the lunar eclipse the small moon come in between earth and sun and block the light of great sun and create small darkness for a while. If any body says 'Master, I would like to see Jesus', we should not become the stumbling block but we should be able to show Jesus to them in the true Gospel way.
The Gospel vision we received is for sharing with others as a part of our mission. As the believers of Christ, we are bound to proclaim the truth we had experienced. We should have the internal inspiration to do this. Others may not be coming to Jesus seeing the wrong ways of ours. We should exhibit our willingness to share our experiences with Jesus. The entire Church should lead the faithfuls for rejuvenation, repentance and a coming-back. All our small work for the establishment of the Kingdom of God will be counted as big in the eyes of Lord.
|
[Extract from Address delivered at Maramon Convention 2005 : Original in Malayalam] Translation for LOL by: Dr. Rajan Mathew, Philadelphia, USA. |
Back | Home | Top | ||||||
Email this Link to a Friend | Send Your Feedback |
WHAT DO THE BELIEVERS HAVE IN CHRIST JESUS? |
The Son of God conquered death, sin, Satan, hell and the world and the door to eternal life is widely opened to all human beings who seek. Every believer’s life needs to be centered only on Jesus Christ. We need to be founded on the rock of Christ Jesus. We are called to live and die for Him and in Him. Every follower of our Master, is asked to try to become perfect like the Heavenly Father.
|
We, the Christian believers, do have large multitude of blessings and a wealth of benefits, privileges and rights through our savior, Christ the Lord. We are given the rights to become children of God the Father, the honor of becoming brothers, sisters and friends of Son of God and the gift of Holy Spirit who is pleased to dwell within us and be our counselor, comforter and helper. All our sins and transgressions are forgiven forever, the sins of the past, present and the future, through the sacrificial suffering and death of Jesus Christ on the cross. The blood of the Lamb of God wipes out our guilt, death, condemnation and all sorts of curses.
Abundant life in this world and in eternity is guaranteed for every believer in Christ. All His followers are declared priests and saints, and citizens of kingdom of God. Provisions of justifications followed by continuous sanctification are offered to all believers in Jesus who is the one and the only mediator we have in heaven. On the day of resurrection all Christians who accepted and believed God’s simple and supreme plan of salvation through grace and faith, and carried out our Lord’s commandments will be given a glorious body like that of our Savior.
All true Christians of Jesus Christ do not have to follow man-made rules, rituals, external ceremonies, sacrifices, observances of certain days, months and years, festivals and traditions to please our Lord God. We are commanded to obey and follow only His teachings given to us in the word of God. In Jesus Christ we are dead to the Laws, and alive to do only good work for God’s glory. Jesus is the key to the treasury of blessings for Christians and they are abundantly disposed to us through the work of Holy Spirit. The freedom we have in Christ comes with restrictions and responsibilities. The laws of love and grace are given for us not to condemn us as sinners whenever we fail, but to help us in growing stronger. As Christians we live in a battlefield constantly fighting with our enemies who are Satan and his powers, the world and the flesh. But we are not alone in this fierce battle. Our mighty Lord has already conquered our enemies but the struggle will go on until the end of this world.
Let all Christians realize and recognize the abundant and glorious life we have in Jesus Christ. Let us always present our prayers and petitions, praises and worship to God in the blessed name of our Savior through the power and presence of the Spirit of God. Let us not forget to do intercessory prayers for all people who need to be brought in the eternal fold of the true Shepherd. Amen.
|
Back | Home | Top | ||||||
Email this Link to a Friend | Send Your Feedback |
|
Many Popes have altered the rules for the conduct of the gathering of the cardinals called the Conclave which elects the new Pope. Pope John Paul II had added to the many significant changes made by Pope Paul VI. Of these changes in procedure made by John Paul II one perhaps had very far reaching consequences even in this election perhaps is that Simple Majority may be sufficient in 2005 Conclave. Each and every step in the present system of electing the Pope has developed from differing experiences, situations, and circumstances down the centuries. |
[Prof. George Menachery is a freelance Indian Journalist and Editor of the St. Thomas Christian Encyclopedia of India and the Indian Church History Classics. After teaching university classes for thirty years, he gave up the job as Head of the Department of Post-Graduate Teaching in order to concentrate on research and publication. SARAS (South Asia Research Assistance Services) provides information and research assistance for topics dealing with India in particular and South Asia in general. He has to his credit a large number of publications, research papers, articles, radio talks and TV programmes. His research activities and lectures have taken him to more than 20 countries in 4 continents. He had read and written much about PAPAL ELECTIONS.]
|
SECTION ONE
Many Popes have altered the rules for the conduct of the gathering of the cardinals called the Conclave [con = with, clavis = key - that is, behind locked doors] which elects the new Pope. Pope John Paul II had added [Universi Dominici Gregis, Shepherd of the Lord's Whole Flock - 1996] to the many significant changes made by Pope Paul VI [1967, 1970, 1975]. Of these changes in procedure made by John Paul II one perhaps had very far reaching consequences even in this election perhaps.
Simple Majority may be sufficient in 2005 Conclave:
According to Pope Paul VI’s rules the winning candidate had to get two-thirds plus one votes of the number of cardinals present and voting. In John Paul’s rules the necessary number for election is only two- thirds (only if the total is not divisible by three it must be two-thirds plus one); but what is to the point: after 30-odd votings if still there is a deadlock and no one has obtained the necessary two thirds majority then the cardinals could decide to elect the person who secures a simple majority of fifty percent plus one. This means that if a cardinal gets 50% plus one at the beginning his supporters could simply sit out and wait for the 30th election to be over, when he could be elected with the same number of votes that he polled at the commencement of the election. The very much more comfortable beds and rooms which were made available to the cardinals this time could make such a waiting for many days feasible, which could not have been imagined in the previous elections where the cardinals were housed in hallways and corridors on folding cots with inadequate conveniences.
In fact when I visited the conclave area in and adjoining the Sistine Chapel in 1978 October, two days before the beginning of the last Conclave, as a specially selected representative of the 1300 odd accredited journalists (this time there were more than 4000) I found the accommodation provided for the cardinals much less satisfactory even than the amenities provided by the cheapest pensione. This time over, although the election took place in the Sistine Chapel, the cardinals lived in the five-story Domus Sanctae Marthae, a Vatican residence with 105 two-room suites and 26 single rooms, some thousand odd feet from the Apostolic Palace, built in 1996 by John Paul II, perhaps remembering the travails of the previous two elections of 1978 - the year of three Popes. The rooms, as in previous Conclaves, were allotted by lot. Last time the Cardinal from Krakow Karol Wojtyla got room number 91 in the Conclave area.
As a result of the present change in rules it was almost certain that a Cardinal with Pope John Paul II’s views was almost sure to be elected since out of the 117 Cardinals under 80 eligible to vote 114 were elevated to the post by John Paul II himself, most of whom reportedly with the same outlook as Pope John Paul II himself. It was my personal opinion that this part of the regulation will have much opposition in the coming days and most probably the next Pope will considerably dilute this clause so as to avoid hard-line stances, because as it is there is not much meaning for the two-thirds stipulation. Under these circumstances chances of Cardinals who had received much exposure during the final years of the last papacy and during the final ceremonies and who also have contacts and knowledge of languages on their side was sure to be considerable.
Secret, Top Secret:
Each and every step in the present system of electing the Pope has developed from differing experiences, situations, and circumstances down the centuries… and to study these developments is most interesting and quite rewarding.
In 1271 the 17 Cardinals started the election at Viterbo, 40 miles from Rome. On account of various external pressures they could not agree on a Pope for two years and a half. Finally the angry people intervened. They locked in the Cardinals and even closed all holes in the walls with bricks. They even punished the reluctant electors by taking off the roof of the building, subjecting the Cardinals to the wrath of nature. And they were even starved.
Finally the Cardinals arrived at a compromise: they elected a six member committee from among themselves to take a decision for them. Thus was elected blessed Gregory X. Naturally he was forced to begin the process of today’s secret conclave because of this experience. 700 years ago at Lyons were established the first Conclave rules. Many of the Popes, including John Paul II have made changes in these rules: “What leads me to take this step is awareness of the Church's changed situation today and the need to take into consideration the general revision of Canon Law which took place… While keeping in mind present-day requirements, I have been careful, in formulating the new discipline, not to depart in substance from the wise and venerable tradition already established” -JPII. John Paul II had forbidden the 2005 Conclave to elect a Pope by the Compromise or Committee method.
Fortunately no 20th century papal election had lasted more than a week. Pius X was elected in a day. To elect Pope John XXIII the 51 Cardinals of his day took only three days. 111 Cardinals coming from the five continents found their leader in the Pope of the eternal smile John Paul I in a single day. John Paul II himself was elected in the seventh poll on the third day of the Conclave.
Conclaves and the Sistine Chapel.
It was originally permitted to have the election anywhere. Elections have taken place in many different towns of France and Italy. It was Pope Clement the VII of the Medici family - the illegal son of a Medici - who ordered that all papal elections must take place in Rome. Now the elections must take place in the Vatican only. Though there was no objection to having the election anywhere in the Vatican the Cardinals have traditionally preferred the Sistine Chapel for the election. And they could not be blamed for that. If asked which is the most beautiful man-made space in the world many art lovers would not hesitate to reply “The Sistine Chapel in the Vatican Palace”. Every square inch of this chapel - whether it is the ceiling, the walls, the floor…of this 136”x 48”x 86” structure depicts the works of the best known renaissance artists - Perugino, Ghirlandhao,..and of course Michelangelo.
The great warrior Pope Julius II asked Michelangelo to paint the ceiling of the chapel with stars and traditional decorations. “Painting is not my trade”, said Michelangelo. “I am a sculptor. You may give this job to Raphael,” he said to the Pope. Finally he agreed to do the job so that he could get the commission to sculpt the marble tomb of the Pontiff. Michelangelo believed sculpture much superior to painting, and had many arguments with Da Vinci on the matter. Today the ceiling, some 86 feet above ground, is filled with the incomparable 5600 sq. ft. series called the Genesis or the Creation. After many years the altarpiece of the chapel, 2000 sq. ft., was also painted by Michelangelo himself - The Last Judgment. These four hundred years and more the Last Judgment has been attracting millions of art lovers every year from all over the world, and recently 400 years’ dust and soil were removed from the paintings to restore their original brilliance at the expense of hundreds of million dollars - and with the help of Japanese generosity.
No wonder John Paul II ordered the Conclave - the actual election of the Pope to take place under these paintings. “At the same time, in view of the sacredness of the act of election and thus the need for it to be carried out in an appropriate setting where, …and where, on the other, the electors can more easily dispose themselves to accept the interior movements of the Holy Spirit, I decree that the election will continue to take place in the Sistine Chapel, where everything is conducive to an awareness of the presence of God, in whose sight each person will one day be judged.”
[This Article is to be continued in the Next Issue]
Back | Home | Top | ||||||
Email this Link to a Friend | Send Your Feedback |
|
Front-runners in first ballets in the previous elections and many expectants entered the cobbled courtyard behind St. Peter’s Basilica surrounded of with admirers and supporters in their posh cars. A solitary figure now approached gateway of Basilica on foot, looked lonely, tired, and crestfallen. To whom all looked contemptuously, came out as per the prophetic word; "He is the one chosen." |
[Prof. George Menachery, a freelance Indian Journalist, had read and written much about PAPAL ELECTIONS. When he went to Rome as a free
lancer for the October 1978 election where the conclave of Cardinals chose the present Pontiff His Holiness Pope John Paul II, he had merely wanted to experience at first hand the joy and excitement of a papal election as described in classics he had read
many times over such as Morris West’s ‘SHOES OF THE FISHERMAN’, Irving Stone’s ‘The Agony and the Ecstasy’, and Henry Morton Robinson’s ‘The Cardinal’. But his Roman holidays turned into a memorable adventure. Read about it here:]
|
OCTOBER 14, 1978 MORNING: I was the only Indian among the 1300 press reporters from all over the world in Rome that October accredited by Archbishop Pancharoli’s Vatican Press Office. Of these 300 belonged to the English-speaking group. The Italian group was 320-strong; the French were 200 odd, and the Spanish/Portuguese 140. In addition there were more than 300 TV crewmembers. Apart from two or three selected TV teams only fourteen of the 1300 reporters who had arrived to report the papal elections were permitted to enter the Basilica for the function to report and to take exclusive photographs. Vatican accreditation was given to George Menachery by the
Vatican Press Office.
These were selected by lot during the briefing sessions and I was extremely lucky to get one of those fourteen coveted cards. Some well-known magazines and papers from the United States and France were willing to pay huge amounts for this card. In fact some of the fourteen photographers present now at the Basilica door represented the most famous magazines and newspapers of the world, having procured the cards from the original lucky winners paying quite hefty sums.
One of the very first to arrive to attend that crucial function before the all-important Conclave locked its doors against the outside world was Lawrence Cardinal Picachy of Calcutta. As he got down from the huge car on to the vast brick-paved yard and proceeded towards the Basilica my Minolta flashed twice or thrice. One or two other pressmen also photographed the Cardinal from India, I noticed with pleasure.
It was with a huge coterie of admirers and followers that Cardinal Siri arrived. So also Cardinal Benelli. Both were front-runners in the first ballots in the previous election and one of these two was expected to come out of the Conclave as the new Pope. Hence the
Photographers vied with each other in taking their pictures. I also took one each. But I was now mainly waiting for the arrival of Cardinal Parecattil of Ernakulam, ‘my Cardinal’. Then came Cardinal Rossi of Propaganda in the company of Archbishop Lourdusamy (now a Cardinal). They talked serious business for a while before the Cardinal entered the Basilica and Lourdusamy went back. I didn’t forget to snap the duo.
But now the sound of music from inside the Basilica was growing louder and louder. Like the Wedding-guest in Coleridge’s ‘Ancient Mariner’ I had to still reluctantly tarry waiting for my Cardinal to arrive. There was still no sign of his car. Most of my fellow photographers were preparing to enter the church to cover the Mass and the decisive guide-line speech to the Cardinals. It was then that I noticed a solitary figure in red approaching from the huge gateway. This Cardinal looked lonely, tired, and crestfallen, yet somehow upholding the dignity of a prince of the Church. He alone among all the Cardinals arrived on foot, walking hurriedly towards the Basilica. No camera aimed to take his picture coming as he was without benefit of admirers and supporters. One or two of the big-time photographers from the US were looking at this pitiable figure almost it seemed contemptuously. “There are lots of unused frames in my Minolta. I need only a few more to cover Cardinal Parecattil. So why not snap him, whom nobody appears to care for?”, I thought. And so I took a photo of this lonely man. He raised his head in some surprise, and went in silently. Soon afterwards Cardinal Parecattil came from the gianicolo hospital where he was staying, smiled at me, and went in, the very last Cardinal to enter the Basilica.
OCTOBER 14, 1978 EVENING: Now, standing in the St. Peter’s square or piazza I looked at the balcony of the Basilica to test my newly bought binoculars. Some days back I had gone up to the roof of the basilica to examine the marvels of its architecture. As a student and teacher of art and
Architecture this exercise has always given me immense pleasure. On this occasion however I had another motive also. I had always wanted to touch the thin white pipe that would inform the world the election or non-election of a Pope. So with the intention of touching the pipe I approached it. But many wooden barricades had been erected to prevent just such an attempt. While I proceeded towards the pipe disregarding the barricades I could see from the corner of my eye a policeman coming towards me to prevent my proceeding further. Pretending not to see the arm of the law coming nearer and nearer and now shouting something very loud, I walked quickly to the pipe and touched it. Turning around I saw the furious policeman who immediately caught hold of my arms. I innocently asked him in Malayalam what the matter was. He shouted again. I repeated my question in Malayalam again. Then in broken - very broken - English I told him I could not understand what he was saying. In despair he brought me out beyond the mobile barricades and pushed me in the direction of the staircase and shouted something like GOOOO! That was a week ago.
Now I was standing in the square or piazza looking at the balcony of the Basilica and the Sistine roof. Suddenly the tip of the pipe began to spit white smoke. The crowd began a deafening non-stop shout “Bianca! Bianca!” It’s white, it’s white. “We Have a New Pope! We Have a New Pope!” Tens of thousands were soon concentrating their attention on the balcony where the new Pope’s name would be announced and where the Pope himself would eventually appear. But within twenty-four minutes of the election of the Pope Osservatore Romano the official organ of the Vatican came out at 6.43 p.m. carrying a half-page picture of the new Pope. I bought a copy from the boy selling the paper like hot cakes among the crowd to see who had been finally elected. To my surprise I saw the lonely hero of my photograph keenly looking at me from the front page. He was the new Pope. But I didn’t know until then the name or country of Karol Joseph Woyitila. Even when Cardinal Felici announced the name in sonorous Latin very few in the crowd could recognize it. Once again the Italian adage was proved true: “He who goes into the Conclave Pope comes out Cardinal” - and the last and very least became the first, a Pole, a non-Italian in 400 years, that too from the underground of a communist country - from the fourth world, so to say - as had happened to Anthony Quinn as Kiril Cardinal Lakota in the Holywood version of The Shoes of the Fisherman.
The huge lamps of the Vatican Palace and the Propaganda College started to flood the St. Peter’s Square, together with the huge Roman moon lighting up the whole area and converting night into day. By this time the crowd had swelled to some two hundred thousand souls filling the whole square and the Via De La Conciliazione up to river Tiber. It was another half an hour before the Pope appeared on the balcony to give his blessing Urbi et Orbi - to the City and to the World. Before giving that Latin blessing he talked to the people in simple Italian - to their great delight and to the displeasure of the Curia officials. ‘Viva il Papa’ Long Live the Pope, the crowd shouted again and again. ‘ Polonnia! Polonnia!’ Poland, Poland. Bearing witness to the birth of a new era the bells in the four hundred churches of Rome began to ring, led by the eleven ton Kanchenone of the St. Peter’s Basilica.
OCTOBER 15, 1978 MORNING: It was in a way my visit to Cardinal Parecattil at Ernakulam to bid him bon voyage that was the occasion for my deciding to go to Rome. Bishop Sebastian Mankuzhikkary who knew the Cardinal’s affection for me jokingly said to me then, ‘Are you not going with the Cardinal to Rome?’ I replied, ‘ I will go if he takes me with him.’ Of course the picture of many cardinals during previous elections taking an assistant with them came to my mind - that was not possible now after Pope Paul the Sixth had forbidden the custom in his directions for the papal election. After the departure of the Cardinal to the airport on his way to Rome for the election I brooded over the possibility of going to Rome for the election. I had read up so much on the election for many, many years that my desire to be in Rome during an election had become something of an obsession with me. This was my last chance, I thought.
Fortunately for me the largest circulated daily of Kerala and India agreed to part finance my expenses and what is more to publish my reports from the Vatican - if in fact they reached India in time - chances for which were quite nonexistent in those days. When I told Bishop Kundukulam of Trichur and others the same day about my desire they all encouraged me very much in this matter. And so I arrived in Rome just two days after the Cardinal’s arrival, which itself was a miracle - what with visa regulations, reservation hitches and what not. He was very glad to see me there. I was able to meet him there often and learn about the discussions among the Cardinals about the forthcoming election. Cardinal Picachy and Archbishop Lourdusamy also talked to me often. It all helped me to send relevant reports to India.
After meeting every Cardinal individually and after meeting the heads and representatives of the various countries who had arrived to congratulate the new Pope His Holiness gave an audience to the Press on the eve of the “Coronation”, to which not only the 1300 journalists with Vatican’s accreditation but many more were invited. While waiting at the bottom of the Great Staircase leading to the hall in the Vatican Palace where the audience was to take place somebody who appeared to know me told me from behind to proceed. I didn’t know why I should try to go before the others. Any way I tried. But the two Swiss Guards stopped me with their extended spears. Picp& +caption Dejected, I climbed down the steps. Then somebody from the Oriental Congregation appeared from behind the Swiss Guards from near the audience hall and beckoned me. Though the guards protested at first finally they allowed me to go up, also possibly because they were amused at my timidity.
When I entered the hall many seats were already taken by officials and so on. The bearded official from the Congregation was leading me in when a Rev. Sr. took me under her charge and led me to the benches. She sat at the aisle end of one bench. When I tried to take the seat by her side she asked me to take the seat behind her. At that time I took it as an insult. (My 1972 experiences of segregationist attitude in the New York Sub-Way were only too strong in my mind.) But she only smiled. She was the official on Radio Vatican who was in charge of all the Polish programmes, and as such was very familiar with the new Pope as he used to give many talks to his people in communist Poland over Radio Vatican. She was a close friend and room-mate or something of the Rev. Sister in charge of the Indian programmes and hence had seen me often at the Radio Station. That was why she took me under her charge.
When the Pope finally came into the hall and was proceeding to the rostrum he looked in our direction, and seeing the Polish nun came towards us. He came and stood in front of us and began to talk to the Rev. Sr. Although the well-built ecclesiastic who was the Pope’s body guard tried to prevent it I shook hands with the Pontiff. The Sr. whispered to me, “Say something to the Pope, you may never get such a chance in your whole life.” I gathered all my courage, and in spite of the tough body guard’s piercing looks, asked the Pope:” Your predecessor Pope Paul the Sixth did not come to Kerala when he came to India, though there is an Apostolic Church there. Will Your Holiness visit Kerala?” I completed the question somehow. I do not know whether the Holy Father heard or understood me fully. But he replied in perfect English, “Why Not?” That was quite enough for me, and for the body-guard too I suppose because he whisked the Pope away towards the rostrum with all his might.
After that the next day’s Mass for the Commencement of the Ministry and “Coronation” - the term is no more used and the three tiered crown is no more seen - was not such a great treat though it was pleasant to watch the whole function on the steps of the Basilica’s facade from the vantage point of the balconies over the Bernini columns in the company of great journalists from the world over.
Why was Cardinal Woitila so late that day on which the Conclave began? Why was he so tired-looking? These questions troubled my mind often in the next several years whenever I looked at the rare Photo that I had published in some papers and at the Vatican
accreditation card and all those other rare and wonderful press cards I was lucky to draw.
Then I went to Rome once again in 1985. I had an appointment with the chief of the Vatican Museums. I had persuaded him to allow me to take the photographs of the hundred odd statues of almost all the popular Hindu Gods and Goddesses that the ethnological museum possessed for my Indology volume (i.e. of the St. Thomas Christian Encyclopaedia of India). Such an exhaustive collection I hadn’t seen in India even. But when I arrived in the museum for the final sanction the director was absent. However he had made arrangements for me to meet his assistant Msgr. Pankowiski, who was from Poland. To curry favor with him I told him that I had organised much of the Malankara Golden Jubilee Exhibition at Kottayam in 1980 that was inaugurated by the Polish Cardinal Rubin, and a large picture of the Polish Cardinal had been displayed by us in the exhibition hall which is today the home of the St. Ephraem Ecumenical Research Institute. Then I told him jokingly that I was the only journalist who knew a Pole would be elected to the Holy See, and I told him the story of the late-coming Cardinal Woitiva and my taking his photo. The asst. director jumped up from his seat and told me the following interesting story breathlessly gesticulating and standing all the time.
“Do you know why he was late that day?” I said I did not know. Then he said: “ You know he is a great devotee of the blessed Virgin Mary, like most of us Poles.”
That was quite true. Most Poles gift you pictures of our lady of Chestochowa, as the Rev. Sr. from radio Vatican had done when we met during the Papal audience for journalists.” Almost the whole weekend before the commencement of the Conclave ( the Msgr. continued) the cardinal was away at the Mountain Shrine of Mary at Mentorella, praying for the Church to get a Good Shepherd at the election. On the morning of the Conclave after the prayers he stood talking to a Polish monk there for a few minutes. So when he came to the valley climbing down two miles the only bus to Rome had already gone. Rome was far away and he had to reach Rome before the doors of the Conclave were locked. Then he got a bus but it broke down some thirty miles away from Rome. (Cardinal Woitiva travelled only by bus, and always wore only tattered old black clothes.) There was no other bus. As directed by a sympathetic villager he approached the driver of an unused bus who was on holiday and told him his plight. The driver felt pity for the Cardinal and took him to the Vatican, the Msgr. concluded. Now I understood why he was late that morning and also why
he looked so tired and depressed. Only then did I understand the reason why the Pope soon after his election flew to Mentorella in a helicopter (not in a bus this time!) to venerate the little wooden statue of Mary there.
That journey was the prologue to the new Pope’s many journeys to destinations beyond the Vatican and Rome, even to the ends of the world.
|
[In prayerful and respectful memory of Holy Father Mar Pope John Paul II, this Article is being republished.] |
Back | Home | Top | ||||||
Email this Link to a Friend | Send Your Feedback |
|
Accusation is the mask that we use at all times to escape from the effects of our misdoings. Man being at the top of the ladder of creation, enjoys by predating upon all other God’s creations that are subordinate to him. Our body is the temple of God and man has no right to destroy God’s temple. God has thrown a number of probabilities for each situation to be worked out for the appropriate outcomes. The trigger is in our hands to operate. There is always freedom of choice with God, but not with the Devil. |
The writing of the fate of a person allegedly on the fore head, before one’s birth, by God is called predestination. “As flies to the wanton boys, are we to gods for their sports with us” (Shakespeare). It is a human tendency to blame others at the time when we are tossed and buffeted by the inhuman and unfathomable heights of sufferings, just as Adam accused Eve and she, in turn, transferred the responsibility to the serpent. Finding fault with others and shirk off our duty is a sibling to our race. This is the reason for many philanthropists to withdraw to the pavilion of cynicism, as they are molested with the spiraling exponents of ingratitude from the people who received multiple types of help and service. Accusation is the mask that we use at all times to escape from the effects of our misdoings. God created the eco system that also works as an inevitable complementing partner/sibling all along our sojourn life. We cannot survive without pure air and water, the basic sustainer of the breath of life. We pollute such life giving ingredients indiscriminately for satisfying our gross greed, and blame others for the human sufferings. Man is the only animal that prefers death to life, while all other animals flee away from it. The reason that we may attribute is that man at times is a maniac that doesn’t bother to give any glory to his Creator, as well as His creations that are planted here only for his mutual survival here. Man cannot live here without the infrastructure of the ecosystem that supports each individual human being in his reciprocating functions. For example, global warming or global dimming can wipe out our race from here. Man being at the top of the ladder of creation, enjoys by predating upon all other God’s creations that are subordinate to him.
Man’s body is also a derivative of the Nature’s legacy. While man lives at the mercy of an environmentally friendly eco system and his Creator, he encroaches upon both by polluting Nature and polluting God’s spark of breath by which he is being anointed as the monarch of this planet. Whenever man faces the crudities of life, blaming the Almighty is his only safety valve; on the pretext that man is only a puppet of God. We pretend that we cannot go against what God has written or drawn on our head at the time of our moulding. It is an assumed reality for some people that we are created on a set formula that goes back to the theory of reincarnation, emphasizing the theory of God’s punishment on the basis of our sins or crimes that we enthralled in our previous life or chain of lives. We don’t take any responsibility for our failures and misdoings, do we? Man has no right to destroy God’s temple (1.Cor.3: 16-17), a frame for God to dwell in us, or the eco system that is exclusively meant for his deluxe life on this globe. When he finds no way of eluding from his profligate life style, his suicidal death that exports him to the land of silence where there is none to console his maladies is the only remedy that he can resort to.
FREE-WILL AND FORE-KNOWLEDGE: God blessed King Solomon, but God is not responsible for his doom at the evening of his life. He chose his own fate by evil association. The pre-knowledge about Esau (Gen. 25: 23) was not a pre-condition for him to eat the pottage after selling his birth right-Gen.25: 29-34. The treasure of birth right was sold for a meal, just as some people change their faith for material benefits. God didn’t discriminate between Cain and Abel, but the older one incurred the displeasure as he brought an offering of the fruit of the ground, not a blood sacrifice, the precursor of His sacrifice on Calvary, while sin was couching at the door. The death of Uzza who put out his hand to hold the ark of God occurred by his own fault; a God who can nurture and care all His creations could save the ark from falling (2.Sam.6: 6-8). But consecrating prophet Jeremiah at the womb was not a fabrication; it proved well for the declaration of God’s glory. Despite both St.Peter and Judas betrayed their Lord, Jesus didn’t forsake the former on the basis of his tears, unlike the villainous weakling. Self-betrayal is a time bomb that can explode at any time for one’s peril.
PREDESTINATION: Just as God gave the commandment to Adam, Jesus rebuked His disciples number of times for scavenging over the lordship over others. He gave enough warnings to Judas that he was bridled as a puppet of Satan-Jn.6: 70. Moreover, He warned that he was going to betray His Guru. Jesus knew that the money he received to betray Him to the hierarchy was in his pocket. The Savior’s fore- knowledge about the impending tragedy made Him to remind His cashier-Jn.13: 18-, “ It would have been better for that man if he had not born” -Mt.26: 24. The number of such foreknowledge apprehensions didn’t convert Judas to evade from the doom of his soul, eventually body, too. Satan entered into him as soon as he ate the bread, Body of Christ, without any remorse or repentance - Jn.13: 27. There is freedom of choice with God, but not with the Devil. “ I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse; therefore choose life, that you and your descendants may live, loving the Lord your God, obeying his voice, and cleaving to him...” -Deu.30: 19-20. Let no one say that I am tempted by God; for God cannot be tempted with evil and he himself tempts no one; but each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire -Jas.1: 12-15; 4: 7; Mica.6: 8; Rom.11: 20- 22. Judas became a property of Satan as soon as he entered into him. Despite he wanted to repent after Christ was taken into the custody of the hierarchy, God was helpless because he chose what he wanted. It became impossible for Judas to get out of the hand of the prince of perdition. The contrition of the betrayer that turned into self- pitying forced the devil to translate his life that which is suitable for the land of the furnace, a great victory for the enemy of God. A whole life is given therefore to everyone to choose between the predator and the Comforter, so that the Creator can wash of His hand sobbingly, just like a father half- heartedly say goodbye to the coffin of the fate of his child.
REPENTANCE: God is not a respecter of persons. He governs mankind and ecology by a code of universal ethics that cannot be altered. The recycling for normalcy of a derailed system is also part of that natural law. If justice is not His moral code, He is likely to falter and collapse. Even angels are also huddled into this justice system. If they rebel against, there ought to be a norm for punishment that banishes them from His satellite system. The same scale likely governs angels, as well as man. The celestials and terrestrials are constrained by the same weapon of dealing against His infernal enemy -jas.4: 6-8. We are not permitted to fight against Satan by his own weapon of seven vices, so also are in the case of angels. “ But when the archangel Michael, contending with the devil, disputed against the body of Moses, he did not presume to pronounce a reviling judgement upon him, but said, ‘The lord rebuke you’” -Jude.8-9; Zech.3. The birth of savages was by a heterogeneous union of sons of God and daughters of men-Gen.6. God allowed a lion to kill His own prophet on account of disobeying and eating food contrary to God’s forewarning -1.King.13. Look at the fall of Saul, the first king of Israel. God does such things because He rules the whole universe by the same code of ethics -Rom.3: 4-7. Righteousness shall be the girdle of his waste, and faithfulness the girdle of his loins-Is.11: 3-7. In righteousness he judges and makes war-Rev.19: 11. He will judge the world with righteousness, and the peoples with his truth-Ps.96: 13.
ACCUSATION AGAINST GOD: Man can never feel perfect happiness in his fallen state because there is an inherent imperfection in our existence here. What do we miss here? The deficiency of celestial happiness is a fact for this anemia. That which is lost can be regained only by the sublimation of our ego that we inherited from our older brother Lucifer. No meaning in blaming God for our weakness of inheriting the devilish darkness by eating the forbidden fruit. God meant everything for the good of man, but Eve’s ambition of playing the role of God severed us from the perpetual bliss, yet it can drive us further to the point of its nadir, unless we try earnestly crave to reach the zenith by this life time that how long it may last is so uncertain and unpredictable. Both Lucifer and man are created for one thing; do it and reach at the highest point from where that we started long time back. He who brings thanksgiving as his sacrifice honours me; to him who orders his way aright I will show the salvation of God-Ps.50: 23. But one person asked me,” Is it not the ego of God that He wants praise and glory from us”? He assumes that Lucifer and man inherited the same ego from the Creator, for which the creations cannot be blamed. Thus man accuses God for our sufferings, just as the Israelites who were liberated from the brutal slavery under the Pharaohs rose in rebellion against the Liberator, while they were facing the natural hardships of a desert life. God’s love and mercy is greater than that of the 6 billion lives that is oblivious to our intellect. Has the creation any right to question and challenge the Creator? But do we like to entertain this sort of continual complaints and grumbling from our children, who enjoy all types of happiness from us without any cost or responsibility, yet they cherish the view that they are the products of our wanton nuptial gymnastics. Experience the love of God who cares 6 billion of us, nurture and protects us in His enemy’s territory that we created by our disobedience, despite we curse Him, ignores Him and hurls abuses at Him incessantly.
There are so many questions that don’t have an answer for us here. But experience has taught us that blind faith that only can give some equilibrium to our miseries of this life, than disobeying God and reaping the atrocious punishments that come as a byproduct of challenging our Creator. “ I f you will keep his statutes and heed to his commandments, I will put none of the diseases upon you which I put upon the Egyptians; I am the Lord, your healer”-Exo.15: 26. If we accept the Fatherhood of God and brotherhood of man, there is a chance for us to be within the vicinity of His presence. “ If a man sins against a man, God will mediate for him; but if a man sins against the Lord, who can intercede for him? -1.Sam.2: 25. Accusing God for fatalism and live as a slave of darkness is an abominable sin that invites accusation by God for one’s cultivation of ungrateful lethargy and indolence. Yet there are commingling factors of natural, supernatural and mysterious truths play behind, it is an open secret that we dig our own grave. While fatalism was the tragic ethos of ancient Greek philosophy, the tenet of ‘ character is destiny’ has been the vibrant keynote of Christian spirituality and ethics.
|
Back | Home | Top | ||||||
Email this Link to a Friend | Send Your Feedback |
|
Perfection which is nothing less than the perfection of God is not acceptable to God. God is father to all the people in the world, and it is natural for children to accept their father as their role model. The most remarkable sign of perfection is absolute love. The fruit we need to bear in our lives are good deeds. Any action that springs out of love is good; anything that springs out of the lack of love is evil. |
“Be perfect as your heavenly father is perfect.” This one sentence seems to be the summary of all that Jesus taught. It is placed by Matthew at the heart of the Sermon on the Mount, the three chapters in the Book of Matthew that summarize the major teachings of Jesus on the Kingdom of God.
Jesus here places the ultimate standard for morality - perfection which is nothing less than the perfection of God. Can there be a greater standard than this?
Jesus places before us the ultimate goal of life - be perfect as God. How can there be a greater goal than this? All the short-term goals should serve as stepping stones to attain this ultimate goal.
Why should people accept this as their ultimate goal in life? Jesus argues that God is father to all the people in the world, and it is natural for children to accept their father as their role model.
What are the signs of perfection? The one most remarkable sign of perfection in Jesus’ view is absolute love. God loves all people irrespective of how they treat God. God loves even those who hate Him in return. Jesus challenges us to attain that kind of perfection - the ability to love even those who hate us.
The other religious teachers of Jesus’ time couldn’t ask people to be like God because the God they presented couldn’t be a role model to people. A king in a kingdom is usually above the rules in that kingdom. The rules that apply to the ordinary citizens wouldn’t be applicable to a king. Thus a king has the freedom to disregard the rules, and be and do whatever that pleases him. The Pharisees at Jesus’ time presented God as a king, who demands absolute obedience from the people. People have no option but to obey God. If someone chooses to disobey, he/she will have to face the wrath of God. How can such a God be a role-model to people?
Moreover, the Pharisees at Jesus’ time presented God as having partiality. God exhibits special affection for a group of people - the chosen people of God. They gained this special place of privilege not because of their merit but because of the faith of their forefather, Abraham. This belief might have given them a sense of worth. However, this belief did more harm than good. It encouraged communalism. It made them look down upon others. Also it made them irresponsible. This is what made John the Baptist say, “Don’t say in your mind, ‘We have Abraham as our father’.”
Although John, the Baptist, was against the communalism of the Pharisees, he himself couldn’t ask people to accept God as their role-model. He compared God to a farmer, and people to the plants in God’s farm. Plants do not have an option but to bear fruit. If they do not, they will be cut down and burned. The fruit we need to bear in our lives are good deeds. However, John, the Baptist, couldn’t set a criterion to distinguish between what deed is good and what is not. In his view, God’s morality is radically different from ours. God has the freedom to burn the evil-doers, but we don’t.
This is the context in which Jesus steps in and presents a new analogy of God: as father. Others might have used this analogy, but it is Jesus who worked out its implications fully.
Jesus uses the analogy of a family to speak of the relationship between God and human beings. The prevalent analogy in Jesus’ time was that of a kingdom, in which God is like a king, and the people in the world are his subjects. Jesus perhaps accepted both analogies, but in a different way. God is a father to all the human beings, but a king to all the nonhuman beings. Human beings have the freedom to disobey God, but the nonhuman beings do not have that freedom. The father in the story of the prodigal son is a father to his sons, but a master to his servants. The sons in that story have the freedom to disobey and leave their father, but the servants do not have that freedom.
Using this analogy, Jesus could easily distinguish between good and evil. Jesus placed love as the criterion. God is perfect, and He loves even those who hate Him. Be perfect as God, your heavenly father, and love those who hate you. Any action that springs out of love is good; anything that springs out of the lack of love is evil. That is why Jesus summarized the ten commandments into the two laws of love: Love your God wholeheartedly, and love your fellow beings as you love yourselves.
Jesus raises the humanity to the level of God. The moral standards for God and human beings are not different any more. And he places before us the ultimate goal in life as well as the ultimate standard of morality.
[ ECUMENICAL ] [ ORTHODOX ] [ MARTHOMA ] [ JACOBITE ] [ CATHOLIC ] [ CSI ] [ ORGANIZATIONS ] [ NEWS ] [MALAYALAM]
|